The Influence of Psychoanalysis on Political Leadership and Decision-Making | International Journal of Psychoanalysis and Education: Subject, Action & Society

We use the OJSSID cookie to manage your session. This cookie is technical and does not collect personal data. By continuing to browse, you consent to its use.Cookie Policy.

The Influence of Psychoanalysis on Political Leadership and Decision-Making
PDF

Keywords

Psychoanalysis, Political Leadership, Decision-making, Political Psychology, Crisis Management

How to Cite

Gerontogiannis, D. (2025). The Influence of Psychoanalysis on Political Leadership and Decision-Making: Exploring the Psychological Roots of Political Decision-Making. International Journal of Psychoanalysis and Education: Subject, Action & Society, 5(2), 80–104. https://doi.org/10.32111/SAS.2025.5.2.5
Received 2025-02-28
Accepted 2025-10-27
Published 2025-12-31

Abstract

Psychoanalysis has long played a crucial role in examining the psychological underpinnings of political leadership and decision-making. This research investigates how unconscious processes, psychological defense mechanisms, and unresolved psychodynamic conflicts influence political strategies and leadership behavior. By integrating psychoanalytic theory with insights from political psychology, sociology, and political economy, this study explores the ways in which personal histories, psychological traits, and unconscious motivations shape leadership styles and policy decisions. Drawing on historical case studies and theoretical perspectives, it highlights the complex interplay between individual psychological factors and broader political systems. The study examines mechanisms such as projection, repression, and narcissism in political rhetoric and governance, and delves into the impact of charisma and power dynamics on political decision-making. While psychoanalysis offers valuable insights into individual psychology, it is critiqued for its focus on personal motivations at the expense of structural, social, and historical contexts. To address these limitations, the research incorporates alternative frameworks, including sociological analysis and rational choice theory, to offer a more holistic perspective. Ultimately, the study advocates for a multidimensional approach that synthesizes psychological, sociopolitical, and economic factors, enabling a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of political leadership and decision-making processes.

https://doi.org/10.32111/SAS.2025.5.2.5
PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Dionysios Gerontogiannis