Abstract
Psychoanalysis has long played a crucial role in examining the psychological underpinnings of political leadership and decision-making. This research investigates how unconscious processes, psychological defense mechanisms, and unresolved psychodynamic conflicts influence political strategies and leadership behavior. By integrating psychoanalytic theory with insights from political psychology, sociology, and political economy, this study explores the ways in which personal histories, psychological traits, and unconscious motivations shape leadership styles and policy decisions. Drawing on historical case studies and theoretical perspectives, it highlights the complex interplay between individual psychological factors and broader political systems. The study examines mechanisms such as projection, repression, and narcissism in political rhetoric and governance, and delves into the impact of charisma and power dynamics on political decision-making. While psychoanalysis offers valuable insights into individual psychology, it is critiqued for its focus on personal motivations at the expense of structural, social, and historical contexts. To address these limitations, the research incorporates alternative frameworks, including sociological analysis and rational choice theory, to offer a more holistic perspective. Ultimately, the study advocates for a multidimensional approach that synthesizes psychological, sociopolitical, and economic factors, enabling a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of political leadership and decision-making processes.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dionysios Gerontogiannis